NoireFX
Hey there dear Guest!
Please be sure to register to enjoy our exclusive content and participate in our activities and threads.
Also, if you register, you won't see any advertise or pop-up.
Thanks for visiting us!
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Pokemon Packs
Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:34 pm by Eli0398

» FREE PORN VIDEOS!
Sun Dec 04, 2011 3:14 pm by Seckan

» Fazefx - Noirefx is dead.
Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:06 pm by Lopo'

» [E] SOTW #2: Smudge
Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:32 pm by TaKeShi

» Official Banner Voting
Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:04 pm by TaKeShi

» TaKeShi Here :D
Sat Jul 23, 2011 6:57 pm by TaKeShi

» Hay.
Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:49 pm by Kainero

» heyy
Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:18 pm by .Joke

» rustyness overload
Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:17 pm by .Joke


Jorge sig

Go down

Jorge sig

Post by MKCSTEALTH on Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:38 pm



I was trying some new techniques with this one. Let me know what you guys think, and what you guys think could be imrpoved
avatar
MKCSTEALTH

Posts : 21
Join date : 2011-05-30
Age : 23
Location : On the way to Ainor

Back to top Go down

Re: Jorge sig

Post by Lopo' on Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:58 pm

Looks a bit LQ, lighting and compo could use some work.
Keep it up tho, i'm seeing some improvement.
Coud you share the render, please?

_________________

iHeartKittenBrains
avatar
Lopo'
Admin

Posts : 203
Join date : 2011-05-28
Age : 23

http://gfx-turf.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Jorge sig

Post by MKCSTEALTH on Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:59 pm

It was actually a stock from this stock pack:

http://www.mediafire.com/?kinnmuzdltr

And thanks Smile
avatar
MKCSTEALTH

Posts : 21
Join date : 2011-05-30
Age : 23
Location : On the way to Ainor

Back to top Go down

Re: Jorge sig

Post by ShadowCause on Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:21 pm

C4D on the right seems over contrasted. A bit LQ. Flow is off, but the lighting is great

ShadowCause

Posts : 77
Join date : 2011-05-30

Back to top Go down

Re: Jorge sig

Post by Iridescent[FX] on Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:38 pm

Agreed with all of the above ^ Though soft brushing is quite obvious.

Iridescent[FX]

Posts : 39
Join date : 2011-05-30
Age : 22
Location : Chi City

http://banzai917.deviantart.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Jorge sig

Post by Lopo' on Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:43 pm

Iridescent[FX] wrote:Agreed with all of the above ^ Though soft brushing is quite obvious.
I was about to say so. :pedo:
Also, i'd like to make this tag collab bro, i'd like to fix somethings in it.
If you agree send me the psd if you get some time.
avatar
Lopo'
Admin

Posts : 203
Join date : 2011-05-28
Age : 23

http://gfx-turf.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Jorge sig

Post by ShadowCause on Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:52 pm

Iridescent[FX] wrote:Agreed with all of the above ^ Though soft brushing is quite obvious.
Thanks for agreeing Razz

ShadowCause

Posts : 77
Join date : 2011-05-30

Back to top Go down

Re: Jorge sig

Post by MKCSTEALTH on Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:00 pm

Lopo' wrote:
Iridescent[FX] wrote:Agreed with all of the above ^ Though soft brushing is quite obvious.
I was about to say so. :pedo:
Also, i'd like to make this tag collab bro, i'd like to fix somethings in it.
If you agree send me the psd if you get some time.

Sure. I'll send it to you in a PM
avatar
MKCSTEALTH

Posts : 21
Join date : 2011-05-30
Age : 23
Location : On the way to Ainor

Back to top Go down

Re: Jorge sig

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum